Higher Education Reforms Timeline: Trump's Second Term

Stonehill College - Office of the General Counsel Review

Higher Education Reforms Timeline

Since the Start of Donald Trump's Second Presidency (Jan 20, 2025) to Present

January 20, 2025
Inauguration and Immediate Actions
Donald Trump assumes office on January 20, 2025. On his first day, the administration rescinds prior Department of Education (DOE) guidance that supported diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives and transgender-inclusive policies in education. This leads to immediate pauses in over $10 billion in funding for both K-12 and higher education programs, with portions of these funds being redirected toward institutions like historically Black colleges and universities (HBCUs), including nearly $500 million reallocated by September 2025. These actions are part of a broader effort to align federal education funding with the administration's priorities on meritocracy and nondiscrimination.
January 21, 2025
Executive Order on Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity
Issued on January 21, 2025, this executive order emphasizes strict adherence to federal civil rights laws prohibiting discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. It directs federal agencies, including the Department of Education (DOE), to review and eliminate programs or policies that the administration views as discriminatory, particularly diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in higher education institutions receiving federal funds. The order builds directly on the Supreme Court's prior rulings against race-based admissions and signals a broader crackdown on DEI practices in academia, potentially leading to audits and funding adjustments for non-compliant institutions.
January 29, 2025
Executive Order 14190
Executive Order 14190, issued on January 29, 2025, sets the foundational stage for broader higher education reforms under the Trump administration. While specific details are somewhat limited in public sources, it appears to establish mechanisms for funding reallocations, enhanced oversight of federal education programs, and preliminary steps toward restructuring accreditation and accountability processes in universities and colleges.
March 7, 2025
Revisions to Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) Program
On March 7, 2025, the administration signs revisions to the Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) program, aimed at tightening eligibility criteria and reducing overall federal expenditures on student loan forgiveness. These changes target higher education-related debt relief, making it more stringent for borrowers in public service roles, including those in academia, and align with efforts to curb what the administration describes as inefficient spending in federal student aid programs.
March 2025
Executive Order on Transparency for Foreign Funding
In March 2025, President Trump issues an executive order requiring increased transparency and disclosure of foreign funding sources to universities and colleges. This measure addresses concerns over undue foreign influence on American higher education, mandating detailed reporting to federal agencies and potentially affecting international partnerships, research grants, and institutional funding from abroad.
April 11, 2025
DOE Policy Memorandum on Grants
On April 11, 2025, the Department of Education (DOE), in coordination with the Department of Energy, issues a policy memorandum to grant recipients at colleges and universities. The guidance emphasizes strict compliance with new anti-DEI rules, warning of funding cuts for violations of nondiscrimination laws. It includes immediate pauses in funding to institutions resisting these reforms, such as Harvard University in April 2025, and threatens further revocations for programs involving race-based preferences or other prohibited practices.
April 23, 2025
Executive Order 14279 – Reforming Accreditation to Strengthen Higher Education
Executive Order 14279, signed on April 23, 2025, criticizes existing accreditors for failing to uphold rigorous standards and mandates comprehensive reforms to the accreditation process for universities and colleges. It requires the Secretary of Education to coordinate with other agencies to ensure accreditors prioritize merit, transparency, and accountability. This could significantly affect institutional eligibility for federal student aid, addressing what the administration calls inefficiencies and biases in higher education oversight.
July 14, 2025
Supreme Court Decision: McMahon v. New York
In a 6-3 ruling on July 14, 2025, in McMahon v. New York, the Supreme Court decides that the Trump administration can proceed with mass firings and a reduction-in-force (RIF) at the Department of Education (DOE). This clears the way for significant downsizing of the agency, hailed by Education Secretary McMahon as a "victory for the future of American education." The decision enables the administration to reshape the DOE with fewer staff, potentially accelerating policy changes like the elimination of DEI programs and funding reallocations in higher education.
July 18, 2025
DOE Implementation of Higher Education Provisions in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act
On July 18, 2025, the Department of Education announces the implementation of higher education provisions from the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. This directs the immediate enforcement of legislative changes, including reforms to student aid distribution, accreditation standards, and institutional accountability measures, further embedding the administration's priorities into federal higher education policy.
July 29, 2025
DOJ Guidance for Recipients of Federal Funding Regarding Unlawful Discrimination
Issued by the Attorney General on July 29, 2025, this Department of Justice (DOJ) guidance for recipients of federal funding clarifies that certain DEI practices—such as race-based scholarships, targeted hiring, or admissions preferences—may violate federal laws like Title VI and Title VII. It warns of potential investigations, revocation of federal funding, or legal action, and identifies practices like considering geography or life experiences as potential proxies for racial discrimination. This expands the administration's anti-DEI stance across higher education.
August 7, 2025
Presidential Memorandum on Ensuring Transparency in Higher Education Admissions
The Presidential Memorandum issued on August 7, 2025, requires colleges and universities to demonstrate full compliance with nondiscrimination laws in their admissions processes, including proving they do not consider race or other protected characteristics in unlawful ways. Following the Supreme Court's affirmative action rulings, it intensifies federal scrutiny through potential audits or funding cuts for non-compliant institutions. The memorandum also encourages collaboration with athletic organizations to align policies with Title IX and other equity standards, promoting merit-based opportunities.
September 3, 2025
U.S. District Court Ruling on Harvard
On September 3, 2025, a U.S. District Court in Boston upholds the administration's actions against Harvard University, including freezes on grants and other funding. This ruling stems from ongoing Department of Justice (DOJ) investigations into alleged DEI non-compliance and discriminatory practices, reflecting a pattern of using civil rights enforcement to challenge such initiatives in elite higher education institutions.
Ongoing (Jan-Sep 2025)
Broader Developments: Funding Freezes and Staffing Cuts
Throughout January to September 2025, the administration has frozen billions in research and discretionary grants to higher education, redirecting funds to align with priorities like merit-based systems and support for HBCUs (nearly $500 million by September). Significant staffing cuts at the DOE itself have streamlined operations but drawn criticism. Overall, President Trump has signed over 200 executive orders by early September, many affecting federal funding and institutional policies. These actions, drawing from Project 2025 recommendations, have sparked intense debates on academic freedom, equity, and the potential to make higher education more expensive and restrictive for certain students, while supporters view them as restoring meritocracy. Ongoing litigation and negotiations with universities like Princeton continue to shape compliance efforts.
```